White House announcement on same-sex hospital visitation misses LGBT papers’ deadlines

Late in the afternoon of Thursday, April 15 the White House sent out a press advisory on President Obama signing a memorandum declaring that hospitals receiving federal funding must allow same-sex couples visitation rights just as they do for heterosexual couples.

It goes without saying this was significant news, especially from a White House and President who have spent the last year deflecting attacks from the LGBT community that it is not doing enough for LGBT rights.

So one would think that the White House press office – which has a staffer assigned to handle LGBT media – would time the release of this news to ensure it makes it onto the front pages of the country’s major LGBT newspapers.

Yet the email from the White House hit my mailbox around 4:37 p.m. – two days past the deadline to make it into this week’s Bay Area Reporter. In fact by dumping this on a Thursday afternoon the White House missed the printed deadlines for all of the country’s major LGBT newspapers this week.

So now editors at these papers must choose whether to go with online only stories about the memorandum or hold the story a week, making it old news for likely a majority of readers.

They could also choose to do both online posts and run stories next week, but some editors loathe doing so. With advertising down and smaller page counts, it makes little sense to reprint a story when it has already appeared online.

I checked several major LGBT Web sites this afternoon to see how the story was being handled.

The B.A.R.‘s Web site has nothing posted, meaning it is being saved for next week’s paper. Whether it makes it on the front page or not remains to be seen.

The San Diego Gay and Lesbian Times also had nothing about the story on its Web site. Nor did the newly relaunched Southern Voice site.

The Seattle Gay News posted an AP article about the memo on its site today.

The Dallas Voice posted a link to an MSNBC story.

The DC Agenda posted its own story today (Friday, April 16) by staff writer Chris Johnson. But in an email response to questions, news editor Kevin Naff said he was unsure how the paper would handle the story in its printed edition next week.

Bay Windows in Boston posted a story by freelancer Lisa Keen on its news blog today. But it didn’t play it up on its main page, rather the link to the story was barely visible below a larger tease to another health related article from April 8.

Chicago’s Windy City Times posted a story late Thursday on its Web site, while the Gay City News in New York had posted nothing to its site as of Friday afternoon.

The timing of the news is doubly irritating for LGBT papers by the fact that the policy does not go into effect immediately. So there was no reason why the news could not have been held until next week, say Tuesday afternoon, in order to make the LGBT press’ deadlines.

By doing so the White House would almost assuredly gotten stories about a pro-gay move by the President on the front pages of LGBT papers from coast to coast.

In a phone interview Shin Inouye, director of specialty media  in the White House press office, told me the news was announced last night because it was ready to go out.

“This was something that had been in the works for months,” said Inouye.

But it begs the question then why not time the announcement to ensure banner headlines favorable to the president? Waiting four more days doesn’t seem like that much of a delay, considering many major news announcements are stage managed to ensure maximum exposure in the press.

Some have suggested that this White House doesn’t care about print deadlines, and certainly doesn’t need the LGBT press in this instance to get the story out.

But this shouldn’t be a print media vs. online media competition. Even if the announcement had come out this past Tuesday to meet LGBT papers’ deadlines for their issues this week, the story would have already been broadcast on various Web sites and in the mainstream press.

It certainly was a missed opportunity by this White House to better manage a pro-gay story at a time when the LGBT press has been filled with stories and editorials demanding more action on the part of Obama and his administration.

And for the record – the drop dead deadline / absolute last chance to get something into each week’s edition of the Bay Area Reporter is noon Wednesdays. The paper is due to our printer no later than 2 p.m. that day, so all news stories have to be filed no later than noon.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

4 Responses

  1. Matthew, you received the news release at 4:37 p.m. Thursday Pacific time. We on the East Coast got it at 7:37 p.m., late for our deadlines, too.

    In addition, the news release was headlined, “Presidential Memorandum – Hospital Visitation”

    Here was the body of the news release:

    “THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    April 15, 2010

    Attached is a memorandum from the President to the Secretary of Health & Human Services regarding hospital visitation.”

    ————————————————————–

    Not one word to indicate the content of the attached memorandum.

    Another interesting thing: The Langbehn-Pond case occurred here in Miami. We first wrote about the case in 2007.

    President Obama was in Miami Thursday for several fundraisers and actually called Langbehn from aboard Air Force One on the runway at Miami International Airport.

    Apparently, Obama and the presidential staff never spoke publicly about this directive the entire time they were in Miami.

    Yet despite the president’s silence during the afternoon and late hour of the White House news release, The New York Times and Washington Post both had time to produce Page 1 stories for Friday’s editions.

  2. Is it possible that they disregarded the print deadlines because the number of print readers is too low to justify holding the story?

    That is to say, they had a good story, didn’t want to sit on it any longer, and felt that print readers are too small a niche to accommodate?

  3. Of course, the late transmission wasn’t a big issue for the LGBT *broadcast* media. OutQ News has eight original newscasts a day, five days a week. We had the story on the air by 5 am EDT. (The delay arises because there’s some production delay and because we don’t have a 24-hour newsroom.)

  4. […] Indeed, while the administration has taken some important steps towards gay equality — it passed hate-crimes legislation, extended “certain benefits” to same-sex partners of federal employees, appointed openly gay individuals to key positions, began the process of ending the HIV travel ban and required hospitals to grant visitation rights to gay couples — it has been reluctant to loudly push for the more controversial elements of the agenda. In fact, the White House even waited until late afternoon of Thursday April 15th to issue the non-controversial hospital regulations, missing the publishing deadlines for many LGBT papers. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: