Prop 8’s Judge Walker Confirms He is Gay

Judge Vaughn Walker has confirmed, for the first time with the media, that he is gay and has been in a 10-year relationship with a man. The story brings an end to one of 2010’s most interesting media ethics stories relating to the judge who everyone assumed was gay–and the media often reported as a fact–yet had previously kept mum.

While Walker’s sexual orientation was one of the worse kept secrets in San Francisco, it wasn’t until two columnists for the San Francisco Chronicle reported the news that he was probably gay, or at least that’s what everyone was saying, that the story become broader fodder. The story set-off a confusion few months where journalists found themselves in the odd position of suggesting Walker was gay based on a column that never really confirms it.

National Public Radio actually did report it, calling him “gay and open” in a story that was later the subject of an Ombudsman piece where NPR’s Ombudsman Alicia Shepard acknowledged that NPR had violated policy by reporting Walker’s sexual orientation without confirming it first.

In the end, all of the reporting was correct.  Walker is gay–I’m not sure anyone doubted he was–but hardly “open,” at least not professionally.  The story is an example of what journalists often struggle with when reporting on people in the news.  Sometimes you are fairly certain about the facts, but you don’t have the final, most important detail: confirmation.

We see this every day in the reporting on Bradley Manning, the suspected Wiki-leaker being kept in a federal prison under harsh conditions. A recent ProPublica/Frontline documentary treats Manning’s sexual orientation as fact but without confirmation from Manning. It’s not a criticism of the report, since others close to him describe him as a gay, but it does show the complexity of reporting on the question when the subject won’t (or can’t) talk.

There are times when the rumors that someone is gay or lesbian are used as a slur to undermine them.  Drudge Report’s treatment of Janet Napolitano comes to mind. Sometime, it may just be genuine curiosity. Much of the reporting on Elena Kagan’s alleged lesbianism appeared to be driven more by curious gossip than malice. Even the Walker reporting seemed to be fed more by “wink wink, nod nod” gossiping than an attempt to undermine him.

Still, journalists need to focus on facts, not just speculation.  Which means that, from now on, we can describe Walker not as “allegedly” or “reportedly” gay, but as gay.  That seems like a stop forward.


5 Responses

  1. I disagree that “the Walker reporting seemed to be fed more by ‘wink wink, nod nod’ gossiping than an attempt to undermine him.”

    A great deal of the speculation centered around the fact that a gay judge would be ruling on a crucial gay-related issue — and the expectation that he would rule a certain way BECAUSE he is gay.

    I can’t recall any specific stories — it’s just the impression I got, which has stayed with me in the months since then.

  2. I agree with Dan’s comment. I recall specific references to Judge Walker’s supposedly being gay, and the influence his orientation had on the ruling he handed down.
    Homophobes and the like were aghast that an alleged gay man would have the opportunity to rule on an issue so close to the hearts of the LGBT community.
    But of course, it could be argued that a straight judge would automatically rule in contrary fashion, simply because he or she is straight.
    Congratulations to the Judge for coming out.

    • I see the point you are both making. While there was clearly some people who made the kinds of comments once the story was out, my impression from that most of the reporting wasn’t done to undermine him but I concede that’s a judgment call.

  3. […] believe the challenge to Judge Vaughn Walker’s ability to rule on Proposition 8, now that he’s openly gay, has some legs.  At least that’s what the Washington Post tells us in a breathless start to […]

  4. […] latest permutation of when to identify people as LGBT and when not to.  Cook, like Elena Kagan and Judge Vaughan Walker before him, raises the question of what is “outing” in 2011 and is there really a […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: